Correcting the Biggest Misconception About This Decision
Most businesses treat this as a much larger decision than it needs to be, assuming Zoom Rooms and Teams Rooms each require their own dedicated hardware brand. That assumption does not hold up once the actual certification landscape is looked at properly.
Here is the actual reality - plenty of hardware, particularly from Logitech and Yealink, holds dual certification for both Zoom Rooms and Teams Rooms. The same physical device can often run either platform, with the difference coming down to licensing rather than the hardware itself, which removes most of the pressure people feel around getting this decision exactly right on the first attempt.
This matters because it changes the order in which decisions should be made. Hardware does not need to wait for the platform decision, and the platform decision does not need to be treated as permanent just because equipment has already been purchased.
The myth largely comes from marketing presentation rather than technical reality. Each platform publishes its own certified hardware list, which visually looks like two separate ecosystems, but a side-by-side comparison of the actual device names reveals far more shared hardware than the separate lists suggest.
Where Zoom Rooms and Teams Rooms Genuinely Diverge
The real differences sit entirely in the software layer. Admin consoles, integration depth with existing tools, and meeting scheduling all vary between the two platforms, even when the underlying hardware in the room is identical.
Integration with existing software is where most businesses actually find their answer. A business already running Microsoft 365 for email and file storage will find Teams Rooms slots in with far less friction, since scheduling and calendar integration come built in. A business already standardised on Zoom for client-facing calls may prefer the consistency of Zoom Rooms instead.
Meeting scheduling UX is subtly different too. Teams Rooms ties directly into Outlook calendars by default, while Zoom Rooms can integrate with either Google Workspace or Microsoft calendars depending on configuration. Neither is objectively better, but one will usually match an existing workflow more closely than the other.
Day-to-day usability differences exist too, particularly around extending a running meeting or checking into a booked room directly from the panel. These small details are unlikely to be the deciding factor by themselves, but they shape how staff actually experience the room once it is in regular use.
Logitech and Yealink Support Both - Here Is the Proof
Logitech Rally and MeetUp devices, along with several Yealink room systems, carry certification for both Zoom Rooms and Teams Rooms. This is publicly documented by both Microsoft and Zoom, and it is the clearest evidence against the idea that hardware locks a business into one platform permanently.
The hardware was never the argument. The license invoice is.
The actual financial difference sits in licensing, not hardware. Per-room licensing cost depends heavily on whatever Microsoft 365 or Zoom subscription tier a business already holds, and that existing relationship often makes one platform cheaper in practice than the sticker price alone would suggest.
Local buyers usually settle the decision with Kickstart AV and Technology once the comparison is settled.
The practical recommendation, then, is to choose hardware based on room size and audio or camera priority first, confirm it carries dual certification where possible, and let the platform decision be driven by software integration and existing subscription costs rather than hardware availability.
This sequencing also guards against the outcome businesses fear most - settling on a platform only to find the hardware they wanted is not supported. Confirming dual certification at the hardware stage removes that risk before the platform decision is even finalised.
What People Usually Ask About This Decision
Is hardware locked to one platform or the other?
This varies by model, though dual-certified hardware from Logitech and Yealink is common enough that checking the specific device certification is worth doing before assuming a switch requires entirely new equipment.
What is the real cost difference per room?
There is no universal answer, since existing subscriptions change the real cost significantly. It is worth getting an actual quote for both based on current software spend rather than comparing list prices in isolation.
Is there still a case for Zoom Rooms with Microsoft 365?
Teams Rooms is usually the smoother fit given the built-in calendar integration, though businesses with heavy external Zoom usage for client meetings sometimes still prefer Zoom Rooms despite running Microsoft 365 internally.
Does running both platforms cause problems?
This is more common than most people expect, especially in larger offices, and there is no inherent technical conflict in having different rooms run on different platforms.